Power should remain divided
Checks and balances reduce unilateral action and force public debate before major policy changes.
Federalist No. 51
Conservative policy brief
State sovereignty, separation of powers, and protection from government overreach.
Editorial analysis is labeled. Candidate scores stay hidden until there is enough source-linked evidence to publish.
Read the scoring methodologyThis issue tracks limited federal power, state sovereignty, regulatory overreach, mandates, federalism, agency rulemaking, and executive overreach.
The policy lens
Concentrated power is harder for citizens to monitor and correct. Conservative government limits federal authority to enumerated powers, keeps decisions close to the people, requires legislative accountability for major rules, and protects states from unnecessary federal control.
Checks and balances reduce unilateral action and force public debate before major policy changes.
Federalist No. 51
Authority not delegated to the federal government remains with states or the people.
Tenth Amendment
Congress should vote on consequential national policy instead of transferring open-ended authority to agencies.
Article I and nondelegation principle
Evidence checklist
Votes that preempt state authority
Support for returning programs or discretion to states
Regulatory reform and congressional approval of major rules
Whether federalism arguments survive the priorities of a member’s own party
Published candidate records
Rankings appear only when a score has enough source-linked evidence and confidence to publish.
No candidate is ranked here until there is enough source-linked evidence to publish a score for limited government. We would rather show nothing than a score we can't stand behind — so use the steps below to research this issue yourself.
Keep going
No candidate is ranked here yet, but you can still do the research: know what to ask, inspect the public record, and compare candidates directly.
Continue researching