The written text controls
Policy goals do not erase constitutional limits or substitute for the amendment process.
Article V
Conservative policy brief
Constitutional fidelity, judicial appointments, and separation of powers.
Editorial analysis is labeled. Candidate scores stay hidden until there is enough source-linked evidence to publish.
Read the scoring methodologyThis issue focuses on constitutional interpretation, separation of powers, judicial philosophy, civil liberties, and federalism. Current rankings use related liberty and election-integrity scores.
The policy lens
The Constitution assigns powers, sets limits, and creates a durable process for political disagreement. A conservative reading emphasizes the written text, separated powers, federalism, and the duty of each branch to remain within its assigned role.
Policy goals do not erase constitutional limits or substitute for the amendment process.
Article V
Courts should resolve cases using law and text instead of creating policy that elected branches did not enact.
Federalist No. 78
Congress writes laws, the executive enforces them, and courts adjudicate disputes.
Articles I–III
Evidence checklist
Judicial-confirmation votes and the legal philosophy of supported nominees
Votes involving executive power regardless of which party controls the presidency
Support for congressional authority and state responsibilities
Whether constitutional objections are applied consistently across issues
Published candidate records
Rankings appear only when a score has enough source-linked evidence and confidence to publish.
No candidate is ranked here until there is enough source-linked evidence to publish a score for constitution. We would rather show nothing than a score we can't stand behind — so use the steps below to research this issue yourself.
Keep going
No candidate is ranked here yet, but you can still do the research: know what to ask, inspect the public record, and compare candidates directly.
Continue researching