Unpopular speech still counts
The First Amendment matters most when officials want a lawful viewpoint suppressed.
First Amendment
Conservative policy brief
Free speech, due process, separation of powers, and limits on government overreach.
Editorial analysis is labeled. Candidate scores stay hidden until there is enough source-linked evidence to publish.
Read the scoring methodologyThis issue tracks First Amendment protections, due process, equal protection, separation of powers, unlawful search and seizure, censorship, and executive overreach.
The policy lens
Free speech, due process, equal protection, and security against unreasonable searches constrain government when political pressure is highest. A conservative civil-liberties standard protects these rights for every citizen rather than treating them as partisan privileges.
The First Amendment matters most when officials want a lawful viewpoint suppressed.
First Amendment
Government must provide notice, fair procedure, and impartial application before taking liberty or property.
Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments
Surveillance and searches should remain tied to probable cause and judicial oversight.
Fourth Amendment
Evidence checklist
Votes on surveillance authority and warrant requirements
Positions on government pressure against lawful speech
Due-process protections in sponsored legislation
Whether rights are defended for opponents as well as supporters
Published candidate records
Rankings appear only when a score has enough source-linked evidence and confidence to publish.
No candidate is ranked here until there is enough source-linked evidence to publish a score for constitutional rights. We would rather show nothing than a score we can't stand behind — so use the steps below to research this issue yourself.
Keep going
No candidate is ranked here yet, but you can still do the research: know what to ask, inspect the public record, and compare candidates directly.
Continue researching